Log in
Latest topics
» Alo Alo! I is new :3by Fura Takahashi Yesterday at 8:37 pm
» Salamence vore story
by MewsSlimyStomach Yesterday at 8:16 pm
» Milotic Vore Story
by MewsSlimyStomach Yesterday at 8:04 pm
» What Song Are You Listening To Right Now?
by eragoneater Yesterday at 3:40 pm
» Random Quotes
by eragoneater Yesterday at 3:34 pm
» Naming Schemes
by MysticLugia Yesterday at 6:04 am
» funny and cute gardevoir comic
by Moegi February 8th 2012, 7:51 pm
» Corrupt a wish
by eragoneater February 8th 2012, 5:41 pm
How could they make Pokémon worse?
Page 2 of 2 • Share •
Page 2 of 2 •
1, 2
Re: How could they make Pokémon worse?
making an xbox 360/ps3 version =0

Milky- Umbreon's Dessert
- Age: 22
Species: Miltank
EXP: 1902
Number of posts: 642

Re: How could they make Pokémon worse?
actually xbox wouldn't be so bad rly cos it would be 3d so an xbox version wouldn't be so bad

vorecario- Rattata's Munchie
- Age: 21
Species: lucario
EXP: 709
Number of posts: 2
Re: How could they make Pokémon worse?
Yeah, making a Pokemon game on the xBox would kill the franchise as fast as Crash Bandicoot and Sonic on Nintendo platforms. General concept of giving the concept to someone who doesn't have a clue what to do with it.
On a sorta related note on this topic, am I the only person who thinks that if the Nidoran lines were released in some new generation, as opposed to having been there from the start... they'd be lumped in with the 'lame idea, poorly thought out new Pokemon' group? I mean, seriously. Being one of the first 150 is the only thing protecting them from "Lol, what the heck is that thing?"
On a sorta related note on this topic, am I the only person who thinks that if the Nidoran lines were released in some new generation, as opposed to having been there from the start... they'd be lumped in with the 'lame idea, poorly thought out new Pokemon' group? I mean, seriously. Being one of the first 150 is the only thing protecting them from "Lol, what the heck is that thing?"

Houndoomed- Gen. Guard Dog of Hotness

- Age: 19
Species: Flaming Horndog
EXP: 3164
Number of posts: 1386
Re: How could they make Pokémon worse?
Houndoomed wrote:On a sorta related note on this topic, am I the only person who thinks that if the Nidoran lines were released in some new generation, as opposed to having been there from the start... they'd be lumped in with the 'lame idea, poorly thought out new Pokemon' group? I mean, seriously. Being one of the first 150 is the only thing protecting them from "Lol, what the heck is that thing?"
Nidoran used to have a gimmic in the first generation.
They were the only pokémon with a gender.
They WERE well thought out at the time.

"Words have more power than anyone could have predicted. Be extremely careful when you use them." ~Zeus
"Umbreons are tasty, your arguement is invalid." ~Also Zeus

Yale- The Dark in light places.

- Age: 20
Species: Poochyena
EXP: 3166
Number of posts: 1029
Re: How could they make Pokémon worse?
Technically, they still do have a gimmick, in that both 'genders' have a different evolutionary line (for two stages; as opposed to one gender having a single alternate evolution like Snorunt and Kirlia, or only one gender evolving as is the case with Combee), as well as different stats for the two genders in the initial form... though if they'd just waited one generation, the could've lumped them (Nidoran Male and Female) into one species as both genders, while retaining the different evolutions.
Of course, they'd have to wait 3 generations to make the initial form look different between genders.
As for a way to make things worse... y'know those dress-up items? Used for photos someplace on HG and SS, and contests on D/P/Platinum? If your Pokemon could keep those things on during battles. It wouldn't be so bad some cases; y'know, give your Marshtomp a straw hat or something. But of course most people would be idiots and just cover their Pokemon in feathers, and you'd have to fight this random mass of feathers where a Pokemon should be.
Worse yet, they'd probably make it so you couldn't take the things off of Pokemon you got in trades. Yeah, that Crobat you got in a trade? The one that some Twilight-obsessed -genius- stuck glitter powder on 'cause they wanted to make a sparkling vampire bat? Yeah, you're never gonna be able to take the sparkles off. It's gonna look like that forever, the poor thing.
Of course, they'd have to wait 3 generations to make the initial form look different between genders.
As for a way to make things worse... y'know those dress-up items? Used for photos someplace on HG and SS, and contests on D/P/Platinum? If your Pokemon could keep those things on during battles. It wouldn't be so bad some cases; y'know, give your Marshtomp a straw hat or something. But of course most people would be idiots and just cover their Pokemon in feathers, and you'd have to fight this random mass of feathers where a Pokemon should be.
Worse yet, they'd probably make it so you couldn't take the things off of Pokemon you got in trades. Yeah, that Crobat you got in a trade? The one that some Twilight-obsessed -genius- stuck glitter powder on 'cause they wanted to make a sparkling vampire bat? Yeah, you're never gonna be able to take the sparkles off. It's gonna look like that forever, the poor thing.

Houndoomed- Gen. Guard Dog of Hotness

- Age: 19
Species: Flaming Horndog
EXP: 3164
Number of posts: 1386
Re: How could they make Pokémon worse?
Create moar nonsensical looking mons.

thaddeus_quill- Raichu's Snack
- Age: 23
Species: Nidoking Anthro
EXP: 1502
Number of posts: 85
Page 2 of 2 •
1, 2
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Home
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Log in




